Up InnerScope!

Month

October 2011

28 posts

Oct 27, 201113 notes
Oct 27, 201113,749 notes
Oct 27, 2011102,025 notes
“I find that somehow, by shifting the focus of attention, I become the very thing I look at, and experience the kind of consciousness it has; I become the inner witness of the thing. I call this capacity of entering other focal points of consciousness, love; you may give it any name you like. Love says “I am everything”. Wisdom says “I am nothing”. Between the two, my life flows. Since at any point of time and space I can be both the subject and the object of experience, I express it by saying that I am both, and neither, and beyond both.” —Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj (via lazyyogi)
Oct 25, 201135 notes
Oct 24, 2011304 notes
Oct 24, 20113,237 notes
Oct 24, 2011166 notes
“If you want to have life, you have to die every moment for it. Life and death are only different expressions of the same thing looked at from different standpoints; they are the falling and the rising of the same wave, and the two form one whole.” —Swami Vivekananda (via sex-death-rebirth)
Oct 23, 201153 notes
Oct 21, 201118 notes
Derrick Jensen: Spokane’s Community Bill of Rights – an Idea Whose Time Has Come → envisionspokane.org

cultureofresistance:

Over the past several years, of all of the articles that I’ve written for magazines, two have caused the greatest consternation and dismay to mainstream environmental and progressive groups. The first, published in Orion Magazine in 2006, was entitled “Beyond Hope”, and the other, also published in Orion, in 2009, was entitled “Forget Shorter Showers: Why Personal Change Does Not Equal Political Change.”

The first piece advocated for giving up the false hope that someone else – an environmental group, a regulatory agency, some governmental official, or technology itself– is going to step in to change the dominant cultural system which is destroying the planet. In that piece, I declared that “a wonderful thing happens when you give up on hope, which is that you realize you never needed it in the first place. You cease relying on someone or something else to solve your problems, and you just begin doing whatever it takes to solve those problems yourself.” I then went on to suggest that hope is actually a bane – because it’s really just a “secular way of keeping us in line.”

The second piece talked about how personal change carried out within the existing corporate culture – like recycling, changing our lightbulbs, or driving hybrids – can’t ever equate to political change, because it doesn’t actually change the culture itself. I began that piece by asking “Would any sane person think dumpster diving would have stopped Hitler, or that composting would have ended slavery or brought about the eight hour workday, or that dancing naked around a fire would have helped put in place the Voting Rights Act of 1957 or the Civil Rights Act of 1964?”

Both articles talked about the necessity of changing the dominant culture by forcing a power shift – a shift of decisionmaking authority from a corporate minority who currently make decisions about transportation, energy, and agriculture, to majorities moving towards a sane culture which drives a new society which won’t kill the earth and our communities along with it.

Which is exactly why I got attacked by the mainstream environmental and progressive groups. Because they’re not about that power shift. They’re perfectly happy to prop up the existing culture by working to change a sentence in a corporate energy bill, or securing a small amount of funding for experiments in small-scale agriculture. In other words, they’re not about forcing a change to the culture – and the systems spawned by that culture - they’re about working within the existing culture to get it to cause a little less harm.

Extracting our communities from the dominant culture means creating a culture of resistance – a movement of people who understand that systemic change is necessary, and that systemic change doesn’t happen just because people decide to take shorter showers.

It’s why Spokane’s Proposition 1, on the ballot in November (with similar versions on the ballot in several other cities and towns) is so important. It envisions a new system of law  which recognizes rights for neighborhoods, nature, and workers; while subordinating the rights and powers of corporations to the community’s new Bill of Rights. It’s an example of what happens when people stop begging and pleading for change from governmental officials, and take their future into their own hands. It’s what happens when a cultural shift is underway – people using the law itself to support that shift, instead of the dominant culture using corporate law to abort it.

More importantly, it is sparking a change in the way that people think about these issues, and examining how the law itself is far from neutral – that it doesn’t recognize neighborhoods, nature, or workers as having rights under the law, but does recognize the rights of corporations to use them.

Ten thousand cities and towns across the United States need to replicate what residents of Spokane are attempting to do – harnessing their municipality and the law to nurture a culture of resistance which begins to undo a centuries’ worth of law which is currently preventing a new culture from emerging. It is that new culture which must swamp the old if we are to continue to exist on this planet.

Kudos to all of those neighborhood activists, labor leaders, and community organizers who have worked to develop Spokane’s Community Bill of Rights – for opening a new frontier for community decisionmaking which openly challenges the stranglehold of a corporate class.

Support Proposition 1 this year. I will be.

Oct 21, 201112 notes
Joyful Abandon: Emerge from Illusions of the Path → lazyyogi.tumblr.com

lazyyogi:

It’s not about progressing, it’s about returning.

It’s not about silence, it’s about stillness.

It’s not about traveling far away, it’s about being where you are fully.

It’s not about building love, it’s about removing your boundaries from it.

It’s not about changing, it’s about flowering….

Oct 20, 2011110 notes
Oct 20, 20111,196 notes
Oct 20, 201126 notes
“Many of us originally turn to the dharma at least in part as a way of trying to overcome the pain of our psychological and relational wounding. Yet we are often in denial about or unconscious of the nature or extent of this wounding. As a result, being a “good” spiritual practitioner can become a compensatory identity that covers up and defends against an underlying deficient identity, where we feel bad about ourselves, not good enough, or basically lacking. Then, although we may be practicing diligently, our spiritual practice can be used in the service of denial and defense. And when spiritual practice is used to bypass our real-life human issues, it becomes compartmentalized in a separate zone of our life that remains unintegrated with our overall functioning.” —John Welwood (via lazyyogi)
Oct 19, 201190 notes
Oct 18, 2011763 notes
Oct 18, 201169 notes
Oct 17, 201178 notes
Oct 17, 20112,923 notes
“I Would Rather Have A Mind Opened By Wonder… Then One Closed By Belief.” — Gerry Spence
Oct 17, 2011
Oct 13, 201160,885 notes
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 26
  • February 14
  • March 49
  • April 42
  • May 14
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 25
  • February 34
  • March 48
  • April 56
  • May 46
  • June 35
  • July 44
  • August 37
  • September 39
  • October 14
  • November 44
  • December 43
2010 2011 2012
  • January 5
  • February 4
  • March 7
  • April 29
  • May 12
  • June 24
  • July 4
  • August 37
  • September 20
  • October 28
  • November 25
  • December 33
2010 2011
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April 32
  • May 41
  • June 57
  • July 37
  • August 5
  • September 19
  • October 6
  • November 4
  • December 15